Buy template
July 2, 2026

The influencer gambling loophole might come to an end.

News
Creator Marketing

Australia’s proposed gambling reforms could close the influencer loophole, putting paid betting promotions, fake wins and creator-led gambling content under greater scrutiny.

Influencers are already banned from promoting illegal gambling services in Australia. But hyping up legal ones might also come to an end — if the Albanese government manages to get its proposed reforms passed.

More than a ban, the reforms are a signal that creator marketing is entering a more regulated era in Australia.

Under the draft legislation, influencers, sports personalities and racing figures would be barred from accepting payment to promote gambling online, regardless of how many followers they have. The important detail is that there would be no follower threshold. The proposed restriction would not only apply to creators with mass audiences. It would apply to any person being paid to promote gambling odds online.

That distinction plays a huge role.

For years, creators have operated in the grey area between online culture, advertising and entertainment.

This could be as simple as casually mentioning a brand, folding a commercial message into a skit, using brainrot humour to feed on youth culture, hosting a sponsored podcast segment, sharing a betting link, discussing odds, or posting fake bets and wins.

All of it can be used to create a sense of manufactured hope — or worse, to influence a younger demographic.

The current platform gambling policies are;

The creator-specific measure is especially significant because influencer marketing has become one of the ways gambling brands reach and engage new audiences.

Unlike traditional media buys, creator partnerships can feel more native, more personal and more trusted — which is exactly what makes them effective.

If approved by the Senate, the government’s proposed package would restrict gambling advertising across several channels, including limits on broadcast ads, rules for radio spots, under-18 protections online and reduced exposure across digital platforms such as podcasts, search engines and streaming environments.

The bigger point is simple: if someone is paid to influence consumer behaviour, it is advertising, and audiences must not be misled.

If content is commercial in nature, viewers must be able to recognise it as such. They should not be left guessing whether a recommendation is an independent opinion or a paid promotion.

Crucially for creators, regulators look at relationships, not intent.

  • It does not matter if you genuinely love a product.
  • It does not matter if you were not paid cash.
  • It does not matter if the brand did not tell you to post.

If you received a material benefit and promoted the brand, disclosure is required.

The recent Polymarket crackdown shows why disclosure is more crucial than ever.

A Wall Street Journal investigation revealed that Polymarket, a prediction market platform, reportedly paid creators to post videos showing fake winning bets on dummy versions of its website.

To back this up, the Journal reviewed more than 1,100 videos and reported that the staged content appeared across paid creators who posted videos showing fake winning bets on dummy versions of its website.

To back this up, the Journal reviewed more than 1,100 videos on TikTok, Instagram and YouTube, generating more than 140 million views.

The problem was not simply that creators were used to drive attention.

It was that the content allegedly made risky trading behaviour look easy, exciting and profitable.

Some videos reportedly showed creators celebrating large wins, even though the bets were not real and, in some cases, would have lost money on the actual platform.

ACMA’s gambling warning

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has warned social media influencers to stop promoting illegal gambling services to Australians, including online casinos, pokie-style games, blackjack-style games, unlicensed lotteries, unlicensed wagering services and online in-play sports betting.

The regulator has said influencers who profit from promoting illegal games or wagering services to Australians are “breaking the law.”

That includes live streaming yourself gambling on an illegal service, showing followers how to play or place a bet, including links that direct people to illegal gambling services, or running promotional giveaways tied to those services.

For individual influencers, breaches can attract civil penalties of up to $59,400, while facilitating access to illegal online gambling services, including through hyperlinks, can attract penalties of up to $2.475 million.

Other blog posts